Comments: 7

• Ceri James from London UkThanks Bill for the history lesson about the ZZ Top court case. I find it fascinating. I didn't think you could be successfully sued for a riff. I only thought it applied to melody. Speaking as a guitrist though the riffs are not identical. Obviously the feel for La Grange is derived from Boogie Chillin' - I would agree on that level but blues riffs are often generic and I'm not sure whether they should be subject to law suits unless identical. I'm glad though that many of the original blues artists won some of these cases and were compensated cos they were badly ripped off at various points of their careers. The industry at that time was biased and probably racist in many respects. Led Zep were sued quite a few times. However, I still enjoy the music and I find it's all connected to the same progression
• Kevin from Miami I am so grateful to be a part of this blues community. This is the first song that brought me to this website. I learned a tremendous amount. I am originally from Chicago, and I thought Hastings Street reference in the song was in Chicago.
• Bill from Los Angeles, Ca"Boogie Chillen" was, indeed, the subject of a lawsuit involving ZZ Top's "La Grange." The lawsuit was known as La Cienega v. ZZ Top. Here's the background: Hooker first recorded "Boogie Chillen," in 1948. He did it again in 1950, and yet a third time in 1970 with Canned Heat. Hooker and his partner Bernard Besman, formed the publishing company La Cienega Music, and they registered each of the three versions with the U.S. Copyright Office.
  
  ZZ Top released "La Grange" in 1973. The way I understand it, Hooker told Besman about "La Grange" somewhere around 1990. One big mystery that remains is how he managed not to hear the song for nearly 20 years or why he waited so long to go to court over the matter. Nonetheless, a lawsuit ensued. They filed in 1991 in the Central District Court of California. It looked like a straightforward copyright infringement suit. "La Grange" was too similar to "Boogie Chillen" and Hooker and Bessman were owed royalties. However, the original case and subsequent hearings before the California Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ended up not even dealing with the issue of whether "La Grange" was derived from "Boogie Chillen" (which it obviously was). But rather whether "Boogie Chillen" had already fallen into the public domain when ZZ Top did their deriving. All of that hinged on the failure by Congress in 1909 to define what exactly constituted 'publication' of a song. And, perhaps more importantly, Besman's failure to renew the song's copyright for a second 28 years (which he could have done) thus making the whole thing a moot point.
  
  According to All Music Guide, there are 138 versions of "Boogie Chillen" - but that's only the number of songs that used the original title. There's no shortage of bands that took the basic riff, added some lyrics, and called it their own. For example, Canned Heat's "Woodstock Boogie" and their "Fried Hockey Boogie." Both are essentially "Boogie Chillen." Then there's the second part of Foghat's "Chateau LaFitte Boogie" where they break into Hooker's riff like they owned it. Back to the lawsuit with ZZ Top... when John Lee Hooker's business partner, Bernard Besman, sued ZZ Top claiming "La Grange" violated their copyright. As a result of the lawsuit, Congress passed several amendments to the Copyright Act of 1909 which effectively overturned the La Cienega decision (which had been in ZZ Top's favor) after which Hooker and Besman settled for an undisclosed amount. A happy ending for intellectual property owners everywhere.
  
  One question that remains is why they didn't sue Slim Harpo or a lot of other artists. The Rolling Stones covered Slim Harpo's "Shake Your Hips" for Exile on Main Street and they made it sound even more like Hooker than Harpo had. And there were lots of other songs that might have prompted an attorney to file suit. Among those that more or less derive from Hooker's original composition, Junior Parker did one called "Feelin' Good." And there was Sammy Lewis's "Feel So Worried" and who could forget Slim Green and the Cats from Fresno with the "Old Folks Boogie." (Which is not the same as the Little Feat song.) Hooker's boogie riff also shows up in Norman Greenbaum's "Spirit In the Sky" and Zeppelin worked it into their "Whole Lotta Love" medley in most of their live shows from 1970 to 73. And the list goes on from Hastings Street to Henry's Swing Club to The Way Back Studios. (This is from my commentary for my Sirius XM show, called Fitzhugh's All Hand Mixed Vinyl on Deep Tracks.) See the set list for the show at my website www.billfitzhugh.com
• Brian from Mandeville, LaActually, "Boogie Chillen'" was part almost every live blues medley that Led Zeppelin did. Initally, the medleys were in "How Many More Times", but they were moved to "Whole Lotta Love" soon after.
• Joshua from Twin Cities, MnNorman Greenbaum's "Spirit In The Sky" features a slightly altered version of this song's riff.
• Robert from Santa Barbara, CaIt was also a hit record in 1948. A few years later, he released Boogie Chillen #2, which rocks harder.
• David from Chatham, CanadaThis song is part of the Whole Lotta Love medley on How The West was One

see more comments